Retiring Illinois Coal Plants Plan Shift to Energy Storage Facilities
In order to qualify for grant money, the plants must have burned coal, have a generating capacity of at least 150 MW and commit to hiring a diverse workforce.
Edited by Margo Ellis
Share
Five Illinois coal plants that are currently closed or in the process of ending their coal operations are expected to begin operating energy storage facilities in 2025, according to Power Engineering.
To boost this effort, the state’s Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) announced $280.5 million in funding over ten years for the five plant sites. The dollars come from Illinois’ “Coal-to-Solar Energy Storage Grant Program,” which in part incentivizes companies to install energy storage at the sites of former coal plants.
NRG Energy will receive a combined $158.4 million to build energy storage projects, each 72 MW in size, at the Waukegan and Will County coal-fired plant sites.
NRG is expected to retire both Waukegan Units 7 and 8, totaling more than 600 MWs, and the 599 MW Will County Unit 4 in 2022. The units are the last of the coal-fired capacity at those respective plants, as other units were retired years ago.
The other three coal plants are owned by Vistra subsidiaries. They’ll receive a combined $122.1 million to build energy storage projects, each 37 MW in size, at the Joppa, Havana and Edwards coal plant sites.
RELATED CONTENT
-
The Pulp and Paper Industry
The pulp & paper industry has seen tough times, but the business will still be around for many decades; the product is too much in demand.
-
Valves in Space
All of these valves need to be built to precise fits and finishes and to stringent performance requirements because “On a spacecraft, everything has got to work. If it breaks, you’re done.”
-
PFAS Chemicals and PTFE: Should the Valve Industry Be Concerned?
Legislation moving through Congress could affect the future use of thousands of PFAS chemicals (per- and polyfluoroalkyl). The house passed H.R. 2467 in July of 2021 and, though the bill is general in nature, it assigns the responsibility to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for determining which PFAS chemicals will be controlled or banned altogether.
 Unloading large gate valve.jpg;maxWidth=214)