Published

Solenoid Valves: Direct-Acting Versus Pilot-Operated

During a recent training session with VMA members, one of the most frequently asked questions I get from people came up: What’s the difference between direct-acting and pilot-operated solenoid valves (SOV), and how do we choose between them?
#basics #solenoids

Share

I work with solenoids so much that one VMA member at that conference joked that I needed to be wearing an “I Heart Solenoids” t-shirt. During a recent training session with VMA members, one of the most frequently asked questions I get from people came up: What’s the difference between direct-acting and pilot-operated solenoid valves (SOV), and how do we choose between them?

First, remember when discuss­ing SOVs, the solenoid coil is the elec­trical apparatus of the valve. Think of it as the actuator with the balance of the valve being mechanical. With that in mind, a prescribed voltage would be required to energize the SOV to make it fully functional.

Direct-acting solenoids have the least amount of moving mechanical parts. Typically, a movable core (or plunger), spring or ful­crum lever are found inside the valve body. Once the SOV is energized, the magnetic field created in the solenoid coil attracts the movable core toward the coil’s center.

The movable core, which was sealing an orifice, now allows for media (air, inert gas, water or oil) to flow through the SOV from inlet to outlet (down­stream). Note that this “work” is a result of the fact the mechanical parts responding to the flux of the magnetic force are on or off.

A pilot-operated SOV also uses its coil to lift a movable core, but these valves have a pilot and bleed orifice that enables them to use a fraction of the line pressure from the media source to assist in the lift of either a diaphragm or piston, features that are not included in a direct-acting SOV.

But why are there differences? Direct-acting SOVs, by design, are a zero minimum pounds per square inch gauge (psig); in fact, most can handle a vacuum pressure of -14.7 psig or much higher pressure ranges. There are several tradeoffs associated with this. The main orifice size must remain smaller because if a larger pipe size is allowed, the coil would need to be larger to create more power to pull the moving plunger through the greater volume of media in the pipe.

Conversely, an internal pilot-operat­ed SOV, which is “borrowing” from the media at the inlet, will also lift a dia­phragm or move the piston enough to allow media to flow through a larger orifice, thus allowing pipe sizes to be greater than the direct-acting SOVs. Addi­tionally, the coil is doing less work and using less power draw or wattage (in most cases). These SOVs with larger pipe sizes can achieve higher Cv (Kv), therefore, greater standard cubic feet per minute or gallons per minute—generally more flow where necessary.

So again, what are the tradeoffs here? Pilot operated can also be zero minimum pilot pressure while main­taining the larger Cv. Flow ratings, added springs and other mechanical attributes of the diaphragms or pis­tons will mean more movable parts, reducing maximum pressure rating, greater wattage usage from the coil and usually more cost per unit.

There are circumstances where the choice between direct acting or pilot operated will overlap on pipe sizes. Using most of the information above, the end user must decide the best flow factor Cv (Kv), minimum pressure in the line, maximum pressure in the line, wattage consumption and cost of ownership (preventive maintenance, repair or replacement).

The topic of direct acting verus pilot operated will be suitable across nearly all SOV types and configurations. For users, this may require 2-way, 3-way, or 4 way, direct-acting or pilot-oper­ated SOVs. Ss with most equipment, the application will work best with the right educated choice.

John Molloy is ASCO Training Manager for Emer­son. Look for him at the next industry event, where he’ll probably be wearing an “I heart Solenoids” t-shirt. Reach him at John.Molloy@emerson.com.

RELATED CONTENT